PERKEMBANGAN TERKINI PATOGENESIS DAN TATALAKSANA SELULIT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33820/mdvi.v49i4.388Keywords:
patogenesis, selulit, tatalaksanaAbstract
Cellulite is characterized by skin topography alterations that have been described as peau d'orange, cottage cheese or mattress-like appearance. All age groups and both sexes could have cellulite, especially post-puberty females. Cellulite is more common seen in Caucasian than Asian woman. Based on the study of woman skin anatomy, fat cells and connective tissue are aligned vertically so that fat cells could protrude into the skin layer and cause cellulite. The pathogenesis of cellulite is controversial and the etiology are multifactorial. If the etiopathogenesis are already known, more effective treatments could be developed. Three main cellulite theories are adipocyte accumulation, water retention and septa fibrosis. Several combination theories associated with cellulit include genetic, hormonal, vascular insufficiency, chronic inflammation, dietary and neurological effects. Clinical evaluation and associated conditions are important for assessing the severity of cellulite and are useful for determining various treatment options. To date, cellulite treatment still a challenge, require long-term stability of influencing factors.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Young VL, DiBernardo BE. Comparison of cellulite severity scales and imaging methods. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(6):NP521–37.
2. Sadick N. Treatment for cellulite. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2019;5(1):68–72.
3. de Godoy JMP, de Godoy ACP, Godoy M de FG. Considering the hypothesis of the pathophysiology of cellulite in its treatment. Dermatol Reports. 2017;9(2):7352.
4. Draelos ZD. Cellulite Pathophysiology. In: Mitchel P. Goldman DH, editor. Cellulite: Pathophysiology and Treatment (Basic and Clinical Dermatology Book). London, England: CRC Press; 2019. p. 24–6.
5. Hexsel D GMP, editor. Definition, Clinical Aspects, Classifications, and Diagnostic Techniques. In: Pathophysiology and Treatment 2nd Edition (Basic and Clinical Dermatology). London, England: CRC Press; 2019. p. 14–21.
6. Blanchemaison P, Frucot J. 48. Cellulite and non-surgical fat destruction. In: Cosmetic Medicine and Surgery. Taylor & Francis Group, 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742: CRC Press; 2016. p. 525–36.
7. Kang S. Cellulite Removal: Noninvasive Body Contouring. In: SEWON KANG, MD, MPH MASAYUKI AMAGAI, MD, PhD ANNA L. BRUCKNER, MD, MSCS ALEXANDER H. ENK, MD DAVID J. MARGOLIS, editor. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology. 9th ed. New York : McGraw-Hill Education; 2019. p. 3865–9.
8. Harris B. selulit. Ibnu Sina Biomedika. 2018;2(1):104–15.
9. Conti G, Zingaretti N, Amuso D, Dai Prè E, Brandi J, Cecconi D, et al. Proteomic and ultrastructural analysis of cellulite-new findings on an old topic. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):2077.
10. Luebberding S, Krueger N, Sadick NS. Cellulite: an evidence-based review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16(4):243–56.
11. Widaty S. Deposit Lemak dan Selulit. In: Sandra Widaty,Hardyanto Soebono, Hanny Nilasari, Yulianto Listiawan, Agnes Sri Siswati, Danang Triwahyudi, Cita Rosita, Reti Hindritiani, Satya Wydya Yenny, editor. Deposit Lemak dan Selulit Panduan praktik klinis. Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Kulit dan Kelamin Indonesia (PERDOSKI); 2017. p. 263–5.
12. Bass LS, Kaminer MS. Insights into the pathophysiology of cellulite: A review. Dermatol Surg. 2020;46 Suppl 1(1):S77–85.
13. Christina Rudolph, B.A. Casey Hladik, B.A. Hassan Hamade Konstantin Frank, M.D. Michael S. Kaminer, M.D. Doris Hexsel, M.D. Robert H. Gotkin, M.D. Neil S. Sadick, M.D. Jeremy B. Green, M.D. Sebastian Cotofana. Structural Gender Dimorphism and the Biomechanics of the Gluteal Subcutaneous Tissue: Implications for the Pathophysiology of Cellulite. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019;143(4):1077–86.
14. Sadick NS, Goldman MP, Liu G, Shusterman NH, McLane MP, Hurley D, et al. Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of edematous fibrosclerotic panniculopathy (cellulite): A randomized trial. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(8):1047–56.
15. Christensen MS. A succesful topical therapy for cellulite. Surg Cosmet Dermatol. 2014;6(4):349–53.
16. Krueger N, Sadick NS. New-generation radiofrequency technology. Cutis. 2013;91(1):39–46.
17. Wanitphakdeedecha R, Sathaworawong A, Manuskiatti W, Sadick NS. Efficacy of multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed magnetic field therapy for the treatment of abdominal cellulite. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017;19(4):205–9.
18. Jackson RF, Roche GC, Shanks SC. A double-blind, placebo- controlled randomized trial evaluating the ability of low-level laser therapy to improve the appearance of cellulite. Lasers Surg Med. 2013;45(3).
19. DiBernardo BE, Sasaki GH, Katz BE, Hunstad JP, Petti C, Burns AJ. A multicenter study for cellulite treatment using a 1440-nm Nd:YAG wavelength laser with side-firing fiber. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(3):335–43.
20. Rotunda AM. Injectable treatments for fat and cellulite. Fat Removal. 2015;37–58:4.
21. Casabona G, Pereira G. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization and calcium hydroxylapatite for improving skin laxity and cellulite appearance. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(7):e1388.
22. Hexsel D, Rosemarie M, and Mariana Soirefmann. Subcision; Cellulite Pathophysiology. In: Mitchel P. Goldman DH, editor. Pathophysiology and Treatment, 2nd Edition (Basic and Clinical Dermatology). London, England: CRC Press; 2019. p. 174–9.
23. A multicenter pivotal study to evaluate tissue stabilized guided subcision using the Cellfina device for the treatment of cellulite with 3year follow-up. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(10).
24. Brian JS, Jonathan K, Vidhi VS, Reduction KNF, Cellulite. Beautiful Skin: A Dermatologist’s Guide to a Younger Looking You. Vol. 15. 2017. p. 124–135.
25. Putra IB, Jusuf NK, Dewi NK. Utilisation of Cryolipolysis among Asians: A Review on Efficacy and Safety. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(9).
26. Ferraro GA, De Francesco F, Cataldo C, Rossano F, Nicoletti G, D’Andrea F. Synergistic effects of cryolipolysis and shock waves for noninvasive body contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(3).
27. Nassab R. The Evidence Behind Noninvasive Body Contouring Devices. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2015;35(3):279–293.
28. Krueger N, Mai SV, Luebberding S, Sadick NS. Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. 2014;7):201-205.
29. Uebel CO, Piccinini PS, Martinelli A, Aguiar DF, Ramos RFM. Cellulite: A surgical treatment approach. Aesthetic surgery jounal. 2018;38(10).
2. Sadick N. Treatment for cellulite. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2019;5(1):68–72.
3. de Godoy JMP, de Godoy ACP, Godoy M de FG. Considering the hypothesis of the pathophysiology of cellulite in its treatment. Dermatol Reports. 2017;9(2):7352.
4. Draelos ZD. Cellulite Pathophysiology. In: Mitchel P. Goldman DH, editor. Cellulite: Pathophysiology and Treatment (Basic and Clinical Dermatology Book). London, England: CRC Press; 2019. p. 24–6.
5. Hexsel D GMP, editor. Definition, Clinical Aspects, Classifications, and Diagnostic Techniques. In: Pathophysiology and Treatment 2nd Edition (Basic and Clinical Dermatology). London, England: CRC Press; 2019. p. 14–21.
6. Blanchemaison P, Frucot J. 48. Cellulite and non-surgical fat destruction. In: Cosmetic Medicine and Surgery. Taylor & Francis Group, 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742: CRC Press; 2016. p. 525–36.
7. Kang S. Cellulite Removal: Noninvasive Body Contouring. In: SEWON KANG, MD, MPH MASAYUKI AMAGAI, MD, PhD ANNA L. BRUCKNER, MD, MSCS ALEXANDER H. ENK, MD DAVID J. MARGOLIS, editor. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology. 9th ed. New York : McGraw-Hill Education; 2019. p. 3865–9.
8. Harris B. selulit. Ibnu Sina Biomedika. 2018;2(1):104–15.
9. Conti G, Zingaretti N, Amuso D, Dai Prè E, Brandi J, Cecconi D, et al. Proteomic and ultrastructural analysis of cellulite-new findings on an old topic. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):2077.
10. Luebberding S, Krueger N, Sadick NS. Cellulite: an evidence-based review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16(4):243–56.
11. Widaty S. Deposit Lemak dan Selulit. In: Sandra Widaty,Hardyanto Soebono, Hanny Nilasari, Yulianto Listiawan, Agnes Sri Siswati, Danang Triwahyudi, Cita Rosita, Reti Hindritiani, Satya Wydya Yenny, editor. Deposit Lemak dan Selulit Panduan praktik klinis. Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Kulit dan Kelamin Indonesia (PERDOSKI); 2017. p. 263–5.
12. Bass LS, Kaminer MS. Insights into the pathophysiology of cellulite: A review. Dermatol Surg. 2020;46 Suppl 1(1):S77–85.
13. Christina Rudolph, B.A. Casey Hladik, B.A. Hassan Hamade Konstantin Frank, M.D. Michael S. Kaminer, M.D. Doris Hexsel, M.D. Robert H. Gotkin, M.D. Neil S. Sadick, M.D. Jeremy B. Green, M.D. Sebastian Cotofana. Structural Gender Dimorphism and the Biomechanics of the Gluteal Subcutaneous Tissue: Implications for the Pathophysiology of Cellulite. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019;143(4):1077–86.
14. Sadick NS, Goldman MP, Liu G, Shusterman NH, McLane MP, Hurley D, et al. Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of edematous fibrosclerotic panniculopathy (cellulite): A randomized trial. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(8):1047–56.
15. Christensen MS. A succesful topical therapy for cellulite. Surg Cosmet Dermatol. 2014;6(4):349–53.
16. Krueger N, Sadick NS. New-generation radiofrequency technology. Cutis. 2013;91(1):39–46.
17. Wanitphakdeedecha R, Sathaworawong A, Manuskiatti W, Sadick NS. Efficacy of multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed magnetic field therapy for the treatment of abdominal cellulite. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017;19(4):205–9.
18. Jackson RF, Roche GC, Shanks SC. A double-blind, placebo- controlled randomized trial evaluating the ability of low-level laser therapy to improve the appearance of cellulite. Lasers Surg Med. 2013;45(3).
19. DiBernardo BE, Sasaki GH, Katz BE, Hunstad JP, Petti C, Burns AJ. A multicenter study for cellulite treatment using a 1440-nm Nd:YAG wavelength laser with side-firing fiber. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(3):335–43.
20. Rotunda AM. Injectable treatments for fat and cellulite. Fat Removal. 2015;37–58:4.
21. Casabona G, Pereira G. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization and calcium hydroxylapatite for improving skin laxity and cellulite appearance. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(7):e1388.
22. Hexsel D, Rosemarie M, and Mariana Soirefmann. Subcision; Cellulite Pathophysiology. In: Mitchel P. Goldman DH, editor. Pathophysiology and Treatment, 2nd Edition (Basic and Clinical Dermatology). London, England: CRC Press; 2019. p. 174–9.
23. A multicenter pivotal study to evaluate tissue stabilized guided subcision using the Cellfina device for the treatment of cellulite with 3year follow-up. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(10).
24. Brian JS, Jonathan K, Vidhi VS, Reduction KNF, Cellulite. Beautiful Skin: A Dermatologist’s Guide to a Younger Looking You. Vol. 15. 2017. p. 124–135.
25. Putra IB, Jusuf NK, Dewi NK. Utilisation of Cryolipolysis among Asians: A Review on Efficacy and Safety. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(9).
26. Ferraro GA, De Francesco F, Cataldo C, Rossano F, Nicoletti G, D’Andrea F. Synergistic effects of cryolipolysis and shock waves for noninvasive body contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(3).
27. Nassab R. The Evidence Behind Noninvasive Body Contouring Devices. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2015;35(3):279–293.
28. Krueger N, Mai SV, Luebberding S, Sadick NS. Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. 2014;7):201-205.
29. Uebel CO, Piccinini PS, Martinelli A, Aguiar DF, Ramos RFM. Cellulite: A surgical treatment approach. Aesthetic surgery jounal. 2018;38(10).
Downloads
Published
2023-06-06
How to Cite
Armayanti, I., & Jusuf, N. K. (2023). PERKEMBANGAN TERKINI PATOGENESIS DAN TATALAKSANA SELULIT. Media Dermato-Venereologica Indonesiana, 49(4), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.33820/mdvi.v49i4.388
Issue
Section
Tinjauan Pustaka
