PERKEMBANGAN TERKINI PEMERIKSAAN DIAGNOSTIK UNTUK FRAMBUSIA

Authors

  • Faiqueen Dhia Salsabila Firlana Adnan Departemen Dermatologi dan Venereologi, FK Universitas Indonesia/ RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo
  • Windy Keumala Budianti Departemen Dermatologi dan Venereologi, FK Universitas Indonesia/ RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Erdina H. D. Pusponegoro Departemen Dermatologi dan Venereologi, FK Universitas Indonesia/ RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Yudo Irawan Departemen Dermatologi dan Venereologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia - Rumah Sakit dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta
  • Mufqi Handaru Priyanto Departemen Dermatologi dan Venereologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia - Rumah Sakit dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33820/mdvi.v53i3.560

Keywords:

frambusia, radiologi, uji diagnostik, uji laboratorium

Abstract

 

 Frambusia merupakan penyakit tropis terabaikan yang disebabkan oleh Treponema pallidum subspesies pertenue. Frambusia terbagi menjadi tiga stadium dan memiliki fase laten antar stadium. Manifestasi klinis dan karakteristik pasien tidak selalu akurat, sehingga pemeriksaan penunjang diperlukan dalam penegakan diagnosis. Uji diagnostik mencakup pemeriksaan mikroskop lapang pandang gelap, serologi, dan molekular. Pemeriksaan langsung dan serologi tidak dapat membedakan subspesies Treponema penyebab frambusia dengan jenis lainnya. Pemeriksaan molekular bersifat paling spesifik, namun prosedurnya kompleks dan mahal. Pemeriksaan radiologi tidak spesifik, akan tetapi dapat digunakan untuk evaluasi keterlibatan tulang baik pada fase awal penyakit maupun stadium tersiernya. Alat dan teknik diagnosis terus dikembangkan untuk meningkatkan akurasi serta menyederhanakan pemeriksaan laboratorium frambusia. Perlu diketahui sensitivitas, spesifisitas, kekurangan, dan kelebihan tiap uji laboratorium sebagai dasar pemilihan pemeriksaan. Uji diagnostik frambusia memiliki peranan penting dalam usaha eradikasi frambusia di Indonesia. Penggunaan uji serologi masih menjadi pilihan utama di Indonesia karena ketersediaannya lebih luas dan mudah digunakan. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bravo FG, Talhari C, Ezzedine K. Endemic (nonvenereal) treponematoses. In: Fitzpatrick’s dermatology. 9th ed. 2021. p. 1–78.

2. WHO. Eradication of yaws surveillance, monitoring and evaluation: a manual for yaws eradication programme managers. 2021.

3. Tchatchouang S. Eradicating yaws in Africa: challenges and progress. Lancet Microbe. 2022 Apr;3(4):e250.

4. WHO. Eradication of yaws a guide for programme managers. 2018.

5. Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia nomor 8 tahun 2017 tentang eradikasi frambusia. 2017.

6. Natasha J, Menaldi SLSW, Irawan Y, Novianto E. Perkembangan terkini manifestasi klinis frambusia. MDVI. 2024;5(2):75–81.

7. Theel ES, Katz SS, Pillay A. Molecular and direct detection tests for Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum: a review of the literature, 1964-2017. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(Suppl 1):S4-12.

8. Ambooken B, Binesh VG, Asokan N, Sarin A, Natarajan B, Subi CT. Dark ground microscopy for identification of Treponema pallidum. J Skin Sex Transmitted Dis. 2024;6(2):185–7.

9. Luo Y, Xie Y, Xiao Y. Laboratory diagnostic tools for syphilis: current status and future prospects. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;10:1–12.

10. Silva AAO, Lima AA, Vasconcelos LCM, de Almeida RA, de Freitas NEM, Habib FL, et al. Performance assessment of treponemal and nontreponemal tests for the diagnosis of acquired syphilis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024;110(6):1237–44.

11. Alhabbab RY. Basic serological testing. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2018. 32–33 p.

12. Park IU, Fakile YF, Chow JM, Gustafson KJ, Jost H, Schapiro JM, et al. Performance of treponemal tests for the diagnosis of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(6):913–8.

13. Giantini A, Wulandari D, Suparmin S. Comparison of syphilis rapid diagnostic test to rapid plasma regain, Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay and fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption for syphilis and yaws diagnostics. Indo Biomed J. 2020;12(2):85–188.

14. Wang W, Fan X, Zhou K, Chen Q, Huang X. Clinical characteristics and cause analysis of false-positive results in treponemal testing among patients. Ann Med. 2025;57(1):1–8.

15. Wellinghausen N, Vivar TER, Plonné D. Evaluation of a treponema IgG ELISA alone and in combination with an IgM ELISA as substitutes for Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) as confirmatory tests in a two-tier diagnostic algorithm for diagnosis of syphilis infection. Lab Med. 2024;45(1):e1–7.

16. Djuanda A. Sifilis. In: Ilmu penyakit kulit dan kelamin. 7th ed. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2017. p. 455–74.

17. Aruan RR. Uji sensitivitas dan spesifisitas rapid plasma reagin dibandingkan dengan treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay sebagai baku emas diagnosis serologis frambusia pada anak usia 1-5 tahun di Kabupaten Sumba Barat Daya, Nusa Tenggara Timur periode 11 – 17 Juli 2010. [Jakarta]: Universitas Indonesia; 2013.

18. Daili SF, Indriatmi W, Wiweko SN, Dewi H, Tahudjaya F, Wignall S. Pedoman tatalaksana sifilis untuk pengendalian sifilis di layanan kesehatan dasar. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Penyakit dan Penyehatan Lingkungan; 2013. 1–33 p.

19. Luna JAG, Romero-Rosas N, Silva Peña SA, Oviedo Sarmiento OJ, Galindo Orrego X, Lenis Quintero W, et al. Diagnostic performance of two rapid tests for syphilis screening in people living with HIV in Cali, Colombia. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0282492.

20. Marks M, Goncalves A, Vahi V, Sokana O, Puiahi E, Zhang Z, et al. Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test for yaws infection in a community surveillance setting. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(9):e3156.

21. Irawan Y, Giantini A, Yasnova N. Comparison of the standard Q syphilis antibody rapid diagnostic test to gold standards for yaws detection in children. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2024;18(11):1734–8.

22. Yalley AK, Ahiatrogah S, Kafintu-Kwashie AA, Amegatcher G, Prah D, Botwe AK, et al. A systematic review on suitability of molecular techniques for diagnosis and research into infectious diseases of concern in resource-limited settings. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022;44(10):4367–85.

23. Basing LAW, Simpson SV, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Linnes JC. A loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the detection of Treponema pallidum subsp. pertenue. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(1):253–9.

24. Handley BL, González-Beiras C, Tchatchouang S, Hugues KA, Basing LA, Sylla A, et al. A loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for yaws: a multi-country diagnostic accuracy evaluation. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(11):e1891–8.

25. Becherer L, Knauf S, Marks M, Lueert S, Frischmann S, Borst N, et al. Multiplex mediator displacement loopmediated isothermal amplification for detection of Treponema pallidum and Haemophilus ducreyi. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(2):282–8.

26. Frimpong M, Simpson SV, Ahor HS, Agbanyo A, Gyabaah S, Agbavor B, et al. Multiplex recombinase polymerase amplification assay for simultaneous detection of Treponema pallidum and Haemophilus ducreyi in yaws-like lesions. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020;5(4):157.

27. Ayove T, Houniei W, Wangnapi R, Bieb SV, Kazadi W, Luke LN, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid point-of-care test for active yaws: a comparative study. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(7):e415–21.

28. Zhang Y, Goh SM, Mello MB, Baggaley RC, Wi T, Johnson CC, et al. Improved rapid diagnostic tests to detect syphilis and yaws: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Sex Transm Infect. Sex Transm Infect. 2022;98(8):606–8.

29. Suñer C, John LN, Houinei W, Ubals M, Ouchi D, Alemany A, et al. Rapid serologic test for diagnosis of yaws in patients with suspicious skin ulcers. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(8):1682–4.

30. Chi KH, Danavall D, Raleo F, Pillay A, Ye T, Nachamkin E, et al. Molecular differentiation of Treponema pallidum subspecies in skin ulceration clinically suspected as yaws in Vanuatu using real-time multiplex PCR and serological methods. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92(1):134–8.

31. Marks M. Rapid diagnostic tests for yaws. In: Revolutionizing tropical medicine: Point-of-care tests, new imaging technologies and digital health. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2019. p. 213–23.

32. Marks M, Fookes M, Wagner J, Butcher R, Ghinai R, Sokana O, et al. Diagnostics for Yaws Eradication: Insights From Direct Next-Generation Sequencing of Cutaneous Strains of Treponema pallidum. Clin Infect Dis. 2018; 66(6):818–24.

33. Mitjà O, Lukehart SA, Pokowas G, Moses P, Kapa A, Godornes C, et al. Haemophilus ducreyi as a cause of skin ulcers in children from a yaws-endemic area of Papua New Guinea: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2014;2(4):e235-41.

34. Katz SS, Chi KH, Nachamkin E, Danavall D, Taleo F, Kool JL, et al. Molecular strain typing of the yaws pathogen, Treponema pallidum subspecies pertenue. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203632.

35. Direktorat Jenderal Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Penyakit Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Feedback surveilans eradikasi frambusia tahun 2023. 2024.

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Adnan, F. D. S. F., Windy Keumala Budianti, Erdina H. D. Pusponegoro, Yudo Irawan, & Mufqi Handaru Priyanto. (2026). PERKEMBANGAN TERKINI PEMERIKSAAN DIAGNOSTIK UNTUK FRAMBUSIA. Media Dermato-Venereologica Indonesiana, 53(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.33820/mdvi.v53i3.560